It only now occurred to me that the featured photo on a post on intersectionality is literally an "intersection." I swear that wasn't deliberate, but I kind of like it more that way.
Camosy from his position in 2018 raises valid concerns. I think Archer/Bhaskar is the way to go as in the book you reference, which I decided to order. I think it is a more rigorous approach that just talking about "oppression" or "power". Our agency is mediated in complex ways by the structures in which we function, like it or not. Someone gets to sign our pay checks or not. A good dose of Marx is needed as a cure for too much emphasis on "identities" in my view.
It only now occurred to me that the featured photo on a post on intersectionality is literally an "intersection." I swear that wasn't deliberate, but I kind of like it more that way.
Camosy from his position in 2018 raises valid concerns. I think Archer/Bhaskar is the way to go as in the book you reference, which I decided to order. I think it is a more rigorous approach that just talking about "oppression" or "power". Our agency is mediated in complex ways by the structures in which we function, like it or not. Someone gets to sign our pay checks or not. A good dose of Marx is needed as a cure for too much emphasis on "identities" in my view.